University of Birmingham

BUBUG title graphic

Navigation Section

More Bikes: Policy into Best Practice

This CTC publication (issued in 1995) describes examples of best practice in the UK and continental Europe.  The report summary and briefing are provided below.

Results
Cycle use in Britain has the potential to quadruple.

Safety and convenience are key factors in establishing cycling as a popular transport option.

Some continental towns have achieved dramatic increases in cycle use. These case studies show that cycle routes alone are not enough to boost cycle use. They also show that priority for cycling supported by traffic calming, parking controls and links to public transport can change travel patterns and meet transport and environmental objectives.

These are the findings of the 1995 CTC Study of Best Practice. Translating Best Practice into cycle use in British towns will require:
  • Strategies to manage demand and traffic
  • Allocation of road space to cycling
  • Links to public transport
  • Significantly increased investment in cycling with a focus on town centres where journeys are short and the potential greatest
  • Land use controls

The Study

The CTC concludes that, as there is widespread agreement on cycling policy, it is important to examine the best way of putting this into practice. To this end we have looked at British cities which have already undertaken work on cycling - and at some of the Continental success stories, where Cycle Planning is further advanced. Though each location is different, common themes emerge to offer a 'blue print' for action.

Some British towns and cities already have a significant number of cycle journeys. Percentage of trips to work by bike at the last Census included:

  • Cambridge 27%
  • Crewe 11%
  • York 18%
  • Grimsby 10%
  • Gosport 15%

Other Cities have set targets to increase cycling's modal share of trips. Among them are:

  • Bristol (and Avon): treble use, up to 10%
  • Norwich: double use within five years
  • Edinburgh (and Lothian): quadruple use, to 10%
  • Oxford: increase use in central area 50% by 2000

To help assist this target-setting process the CTC has developed modelling, which looks at the way hilliness, urban patterns and cycle safety affect cycle use. In this way it is possible to predict the potential for cycle use in any town.  Among the urban areas we have studied are:

Town Description Current % of trips
within the Borough
Theoretical % of cycle trips
(if accident rate by cycle halved)
Birmingham Reasonably flat

1.7%

6%

Bradford Very hilly

0.9%

3%

Colchester Moderately hilly

7.0%

15%

Leicester Moderately hilly

4.0%

11%

Nottingham Hilly

3.2%

9%

York Reasonably flat

21.9%

27%

More dramatic improvements in safety in line with Continental experience would realise greater increases in cycle use.

Continental success stories

But how did we achieve these increases and the benefits that accrue? Continental experience is revealing because significant increases in cycle use have been planned and realised. This action is partly because a 'culture of cycling' has been established, but mostly because higher car ownership than in Britain has caused the 'environmental crisis' to arrive earlier, Ways of tackling this crisis, which includes ambitious urban cycle strategies, are indicative of policies Britain could pursue.

Some of the Continental examples are relatively well-known. They include:

  • The German 'Cycle-Friendly Towns' project
  • The Dutch 'Cycling Master Plan'
  • The Danish 'Safe Routes to School' work

Some town centres have spectacular cycle flows:

  • Copenhagen: 30% of all journeys
  • Groningen (regional capital of northern Netherlands: 54% of all journeys
  • Munster (German University town): from 29% to 43% within ten years.

Other successes are equally impressive. Austrian and Swiss cities have implemented cycling as a means to combat air pollution. Italian cities are starting to promote cycling as a cure for congestion. Historic cities from Delft to Krakow are closing their centres to car traffic but continuing to allow cycle access. Even large cities such as Munich have increased cycling's model share from 6% to 15%. In a total reversal of cycling's previous negative image, it is the most prosperous and progressive cities which are the most enthusiastic to achieve more cycle use.

Some case studies at a glance:

City Population % journeys by cycle
(City Centre)
Increase in cycle use
(over time)
Main traffic measures
Basel

172,000

16

8-16 (1970 - 1990) Tram priority, traffic restraint, cycle network (city wide).
Graz

240,000

14

7-14 (1979 - 1991) Pedestrian measures, parking reduction, traffic calming, cycle parking and signing.
Hanover

550,000

16

9-16 Land use planning, traffic calming, cycle routes (450 km), car parking control.
Munster

280,000

43

29-43 (1981 - 1992) Quality cycle routes, traffic calming, links to public transport.
Delft

80,000

43

40-43 (1982 - 1985) Compact land use, traffic cells, complete cycle network.

Conclusion

Best Practice summarises the achievements of UK and continental policies, Although every place has its own characteristics, it is possible to highlight a number of key findings. These are:

  • The most successful cycle policies are integral components of broader, sustainable transport policies.
  • Cycle routes and networks are important, but they are only part of overall programmes.
  • Reducing vehicle speeds by traffic calming is vital.
  • By taking comprehensive measures it is possible to increase cycle use in tandem with improved safety.
  • Promotional campaigns stressing the speed, utility and health benefits of cycling play an important part in changing the perceptions of politicians, planners and the public.
  • Issues such as cycle theft, parking and better links with public transport must be tackled.
  • Councils in mainland Europe have much higher spending plans and more ambitious cycle programmes than in the UK. We need to revise our efforts upwards so as to capture the full benefits.

Accordingly, Best Practice concludes with detailed recommendations for change. Central to these are that Britain needs a 'National Cycling Strategy' and coherent local policies. By drawing on the 'best of the best' the full study report aims to speed up the actual implementation of new pro-cycling policies and achieve higher levels of bicycle use.

The Policy Context

The bike is back. Cycling as a mode of transport has returned to favour, with national government and with local councils. As debate continues over the best way forward in solving Britain's transport crisis, cycling has emerged as one of the main modes to promote. Its advantages are such that it can become a major contributor to new environmental objectives.

The Cyclists' Touring Club (CTC) has previously published two major pieces of research on the benefits of cycling. 'Bikes not fumes' showed how a shift away from short car trips to bike use could bring significant reductions in toxic vehicle emissions. 'Costing the benefits' showed the role increased levels of cycling could play in:

  • Cutting congestion
  • Improving health
  • Reducing global-warming gases
  • Increasing travel choice

Meanwhile the British Medical Association have published 'Cycling Towards Health and Safety', showing how regular exercise such as cycling decreases stress, heart disease and respiratory problems.

The latest National Travel Survey confirmed once again that most of all journeys are very short: 72% under five miles, 50% two miles or less. The potential for more cycling is considerable.

All of these points were strongly endorsed by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution in its ground-breaking 1994 report on Transport. The Commission called for:

  • A quadrupling of urban cycle journeys within ten years
  • Comprehensive networks of safe cycle routes
  • Halving the cycling casualty rate
  • A ten-year programme to create high-quality cycle facilities

National government has responded to these changed perceptions. The Departments of Environment and Transport have stated that: "The level of cycling in the UK is significantly lower than that in a number of countries which have taken steps to make cycle attractive as a means of everyday transport." (Source: Planning Policy Guidance 13, March 1994)

In June 1994 the Department of Transport (DOT) issued a 'Cycling Statement' saying, "Cycling is an important form of transport. It is economical and efficient for local journeys, environmentally friendly and healthy." Local authorities developers and employers were urged to do more to help the Department promote cycling. More money was allocated to cycling through the TPP and Package Bid systems, and work began on major projects like the 1,000-mile London Cycle Network.

The CTC conclude that what is required next is the further development of the Package Approach to transport funding and work towards a 'National Cycling Strategy'. This would involve closer liaison with local government, business, public bodies, public transport operators and cycling groups, to promote the many aspects of bike use.

The full report, More Bikes - Policy into Best Practice, is published by the Cyclists' Touring Club (August 1995) and copies are available at £10 (£5 to CTC members, free to CTC Corporate Affiliates).

The full report includes:

  • A review of the major determinants of cycle use
  • 10 continental case studies
  • 15 British town fact files and
  • 25 recommendations.

More Bikes - PoIicy into Best Practice is essential reading for:

  • Local authority members
  • Traffic and transport professionals
  • Environmental groups.

The survey of Best Practice was carried out by the CTC with support from the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund.

CTC Parklands, Railton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 9JX